Technology for Social Good
SIL 503, Fall 2026, University of Michigan School of Social Work
Innovation and Ethics in Social Impact Leadership. 3 credits, in person,
Wednesdays 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM, September 9 to December 9, in SSWB B760.
A course in the MA in Social Impact Leadership.
Technology now shapes how social impact organizations serve, fund, evaluate, and sometimes surveil the communities they exist for. This course prepares you to make and guide technology decisions in that environment.
The research record points in both directions. Randomized trials show AI assistance narrowing skill gaps, expanding what novice workers can do, and extending access to mental health support. Documented deployments in unemployment benefits, child welfare, and Medicaid eligibility show automation scaling injustice. The course assigns both.
Modules
Deliverables
Course structure
Each week runs half seminar, half lab. You will use AI tools nearly every week under the course's disclosure and verification policy. No technical background is assumed, lab failures have no grade penalty, and the participation structure rewards documenting what went wrong and what you learned from it.
Schedule
The week-by-week calendar of sessions, labs, and due dates, September 2 through December 9.
Assignments
A technology case analysis, a short video on one of three tracks, and a consultant memo built on one interview.
Sociotechnical protocol
The one-page set of questions this course asks of every technology, in failure and in success.
Case bank
Documented cases with verified sources, from Michigan's MiDAS to Māori-owned speech AI.
Interactive activities
Small in-browser tools we built for specific weeks, plus the free tools we use in class.
Schedule
Class meets Wednesdays, 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM in SSWB B760, September 9 through December 9, with no class on November 25 (Thanksgiving recess). Details for each session are on its week page, linked below.
Module 1, Foundations (Weeks 1–2)
Working definitions, the history of technology in social services, and the sociotechnical protocol used all semester.
| # | Date | Session | Lab | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sep 9 | Definitions of technology and social good | Collaborative definition workshop | |
| 2 | Sep 16 | History of technology in social services | Protocol on paired artifacts |
Module 2, AI (Weeks 3–6)
Algorithmic bias and fairness, how generative AI works, critical and safe use, and organizational adoption.
| # | Date | Session | Lab | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Sep 23 | Algorithmic bias and fairness | The paired-case lab | Ethics Case launched |
| 4 | Sep 30 | Language model mechanics | Transformer Explainer + hallucination hunt | |
| 5 | Oct 7 | AI literacy | Calibration, ask-AI-or-ask-a-person triage sort, our AI-disclosure form | Digital Story track chosen |
| 6 | Oct 14 | AI adoption in organizations, with Lauri Goldkind (Fordham) | Debate Lab 1 | Organization named |
Module 3, Data, industry, and capacity (Weeks 7–10)
Data rights and privacy, how the technology industry is structured, the digital maturity of an organization, and digital storytelling.
| # | Date | Session | Lab | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Oct 21 | Data sovereignty and privacy | Digital Defense Playbook | Ethics Case due (25%) |
| 8 | Oct 28 | Structure of the technology industry, with Jes Kane (former Google.org) | Funder grant teardown | |
| 9 | Nov 4 | Digital maturity | Capacity assessment + interview protocol | Strategy Pitch launched, interview protocol |
| 10 | Nov 11 | Digital storytelling | Story circle + communication brief | Video notes and communication brief; rough cut (ungraded) |
Module 4, Equity and implementation (Weeks 11–13)
Production and accessibility, design justice and ICT4D, digital equity, and the strategy pitch briefed in class.
| # | Date | Session | Lab | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Nov 18 | Production and accessibility | Production stations + caption sprint | Capacity brief |
| 12 | Dec 2 | Design justice, digital equity, and environmental costs | Debate Lab 2 (Detroit edition) + final consult | Digital Story due (25%), memo outline + metrics |
| 13 | Dec 9 | Strategy pitch briefings | Briefings + feedback, story screening | Briefing (of 25%) |
Learning outcomes
By December you will be able to evaluate a technology through an ethical lens and name both its opportunities and its harms. You will be able to explain how generative AI works in plain language, use it responsibly, and reason about when an organization should decline to adopt it. You will have made a short video about a problem you have seen yourself, aimed at an audience you named and asking them for something specific, with documented accessibility and consent practices, and you will have presented a defensible technology recommendation to a real organization's leadership.
Instructor
Nari Yoo, PhD
(she/her), nariyoo@umich.edu
Office hours by appointment: calendly.com/nari-yoo. Expect a reply within 48 hours.
Community organizations interested in hosting a future student group: see For community organizations.
Site and Canvas
This site holds the schedule, weekly pages, assignment guides, and resources. Canvas holds submissions, grades, announcements, and readings that need library access. The site itself was built with Claude, a language model made by Anthropic.